Wednesday, January 10, 2007

Skeptic Magazine



The lastest issue of Skeptic Magazine has Bart Ehrman's review of the Gospel of Judas, as well as a review of his book Misquoting Jesus. Also included is a review of Breaking the Spell, an article called the "Fallacy of the Golden Mean", rational attacks on intelligent design and 9/11 conspiracies, and more abducting aliens and psychics than you can shake a stick at. I just renewed my subscription. More on their website.

The author of The Progress Paradox addresses religion.

The Colonial Books




Where it all began.

Misquoting Jesus

Tuesday, January 9, 2007

Blink and The Tipping Point



Malcolm Gladwell's books are justifiably praised, but his magazine pieces are his real achievement. Except for the most recent ones, they are all posted on Gladwell's website. His articles cover a broad spectrum of topics, but share one common denominator: Gladwell can make anything interesting. Some of his titles:

Group Think
What does 'Saturday Night Live'
have in common with German philosophy?
Smaller
The disposable diaper and the meaning of progress.
Something Borrowed
Should a charge of plagiarism ruin your life?
The Picture Problem
Mammography, air power, and the limits of looking.
The Ketchup Conundrum
Mustard now comes in dozens of varieties.
Why has ketchup stayed the same?

The last article was particularly winning, containing this jewel:

The story of World's Best Ketchup cannot properly be told without a man from White Plains, New York, named Howard Moskowitz. Moskowitz is sixty, short and round, with graying hair and huge gold-rimmed glasses. When he talks, he favors the Socratic monologue—a series of questions that he poses to himself, then answers, punctuated by "ahhh" and much vigorous nodding. He is a lineal descendant of the legendary eighteenth-century Hasidic rabbi known as the Seer of Lublin. He keeps a parrot. At Harvard, he wrote his doctoral dissertation on psychophysics, and all the rooms on the ground floor of his food-testing and market-research business are named after famous psychophysicists. ("Have you ever heard of the name Rose Marie Pangborn? Ahhh. She was a professor at Davis. Very famous. This is the Pangborn kitchen.")Moskowitz is a man of uncommon exuberance and persuasiveness: if he had been your freshman statistics professor, you would today be a statistician. "My favorite writer? Gibbon," he burst out, when we met not long ago. He had just been holding forth on the subject of sodium solutions. "Right now I'm working my way through the Hales history of the Byzantine Empire. Holy shit! Everything is easy until you get to the Byzantine Empire. It's impossible. One emperor is always killing the others, and everyone has five wives or three husbands. It's very Byzantine."

Monday, January 8, 2007

Freedom Evolves



The elephant in the room. Free will is on the table.

The Third Chimpanzee


I just got this on Mike's recommendation. On the fast track.

Fooled By Randomness



My highest recommedation. I would love to discuss this at a future meeting.

Good stuff on his website as well.

Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid



Maybe this is too long, too hard and too "mathy", but I'm going for it. Mike claims that he will be joining me in my attempt to conquer this Pulitzer Prize-winning work. Come on in, the water's warm.

The God Delusion



He had me at the preface. Good call, Tim.

Check out his website here.

Breaking The Spell



I love this book.

Forgive this digression. Reading this tonight I was struck by the connections with other works represented here. Earlier I noticed in the preface to The God Delusion that Dawkins gave thanks "for a variety of reasons" to Daniel Dennett and Sam Harris. In Breaking the Spell, Dennett, unsurprisingly, cites Dawkins frequently (particularly, though not exclusively, his idea of "memes"). His mention of kleptocracy merely reminded me of Jared Diamond, while the book is elsewhere replete with direct references to Diamond, whom he calls, along with others, "[t]he pioneers whose scientific work on religion I have been introducing." At another point this evening I unintentionally placed Dennett's book next to Hofstadter's Godel, Ecsher and Bach; something clicked, and I remebered that Dennett and Hofstadter collaborated as editor's of The Mind's I, a collection of essays about consciousness. Then, as if to deliberately create a longing for books not yet completed, Dennett's discussion of Wittgenstein foreshadowed another work I will later suggest to the group (and currently located on my night table). Later in the evening, I read Dennett's attack on the "mysterian" doctrine that insists that consciousness is not a puzzle but rather a mystery. This is exactly the dichotomy discussed in Malcolm Gladwell's fascinating and contrarian article this past week about Enron (and to which I do not yet have a link, but you can borrow my copy of the New Yorker). OK, I'm done now. Oh, wait: did I mention Dennett's reference to those great American non-believers, Franklin and Paine . . .

The End Of Faith


Collapse


Under The Banner Of Heaven




The Progress Paradox